Category: High Court

The Bombay High Court delivered sharp remarks against the Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday, August 11, 2026. The Bombay High Court Maharashtra FDA Cadila 2026 ruling came while hearing a petition filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited. The company had challenged FDA’s decision to seize its drug stocks and stop their sale across Maharashtra. After strong criticism from the bench, the FDA agreed to withdraw the existing stop-sale order against Cadila.

What Did the Bombay High Court Say About FDA’s Actions?

A bench of Acting Chief Justice R.V. Ghuge and Justice Gautam Ankhad heard the petition filed by Cadila Pharmaceuticals. The bench made pointed remarks about the FDA’s approach to drug regulation.

The court said that shooting first and asking questions later is the law of the wild west. It clearly stated that this approach has no place in a legal system governed by due process. The bench also remarked that the FDA has the power of a sword but is using it to kill a mosquito. This sharp observation directly questioned the proportionality of the FDA’s action against Cadila.

Who Filed the Petition and What Did They Argue?

Senior advocate Birendra Saraf appeared on behalf of Cadila Pharmaceuticals. He argued that the FDA’s stop-sale and seizure orders had caused severe financial losses to the company. He urged the court to quash the orders immediately.

The court was careful to clarify that it had no doubt about the FDA’s statutory powers. The bench said the issue was not whether the FDA had the authority to act but whether those powers were used in a fair and proportionate manner in this specific case.

Why Did Maharashtra FDA Stop Cadila’s Drug Sales?

Maharashtra FDA, led by Commissioner Tukaram Mundhe, had seized stocks of several Cadila pharmaceutical products. The FDA also halted their sale and distribution across the state.

The FDA defended its action before the court. It argued that some of Cadila’s products had similar or identical branding despite containing different Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. The FDA claimed this similar packaging could create confusion among patients and healthcare professionals. This confusion, it said, could lead to the wrong drug being administered to a patient.

What Was the Court’s Biggest Concern?

The court made clear that its primary concern was not the financial loss to Cadila. The bench focused directly on the impact on patients. It noted that the stop-sale order had prevented patients from accessing certain medicines for 20 days at the time of the hearing. By August 11, the effective period without access to those drugs had stretched to 32 days.

Acting Chief Justice Ghuge said the court was deeply concerned that patients had been denied access to necessary medication for over a month due to the FDA’s order.

What Warning Did the Court Issue to FDA?

The bench did not stop at criticism. It issued a direct warning to the Maharashtra FDA. The court said that if the FDA issues similar orders in the future without following proper legal procedure, it will face heavy financial penalties.

This warning is significant. It puts the FDA and Commissioner Tukaram Mundhe on notice that aggressive enforcement action must always be balanced with adherence to due process and principles of natural justice.

What Has the FDA Agreed to Do?

Following the court’s sharp observations, Maharashtra FDA agreed to withdraw the current stop-sale order against Cadila Pharmaceuticals. The FDA also gave the bench a clear set of assurances about future procedure. It confirmed that before taking any fresh action against Cadila, it will issue a fresh show-cause notice to the company. Cadila will be given adequate time to file a written response to the allegations. A proper hearing will be conducted before any final order is passed.

What Does This Mean for Tukaram Mundhe’s FDA Drive?

This ruling comes at a significant time. FDA Commissioner Tukaram Mundhe launched an aggressive statewide enforcement drive shortly after taking charge in May 2026. The drive included hundreds of raids, seizures, and stop-sale orders across Maharashtra. While the campaign has been widely appreciated for cracking down on adulterated food and substandard drugs, this ruling signals that courts will closely scrutinise whether enforcement follows due process.

The Bombay High Court has drawn a clear line. Strong enforcement is welcome. But every action must follow the correct legal procedure and must be proportionate to the alleged violation.

Supreme Court footpath pedestrian right: The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark ruling on June 19, 2026, that directly affects every pedestrian in the country. The court declared that the Supreme Court footpath pedestrian right 2026 verdict is a fundamental constitutional right. Walking on a designated footpath takes priority over the movement of motor vehicles. This judgment has wide-ranging implications for urban planning, road safety, and civic infrastructure across India, including Nagpur.

What Did the Supreme Court Exactly Rule?

A bench of Justices P.S. Narasimha and Atul S. Chandurkar delivered the judgment. The bench held that the right to walk is derived from Article 19(1)(d) of the Constitution. This article guarantees freedom of movement to every citizen. The court also read this right alongside Articles 19(1)(a), 19(1)(b), 19(1)(c), and Article 21, which protects the right to life.

The bench clearly stated that the fundamental right to walk on a demarcated footpath is primary. This right takes priority over movement by motorised vehicles. No authority can override this constitutional guarantee.

Who Is Responsible for Building and Maintaining Footpaths?

The Supreme Court placed the responsibility squarely on civic bodies. The bench stated that whenever a road is constructed, authorities have a corresponding obligation to provide safe pedestrian infrastructure. Urban development bodies, municipal corporations, municipalities, and panchayats are all responsible for this duty.

Their responsibilities include demarcating, constructing, preserving, and protecting footpaths. This ruling directly applies to civic bodies like the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. NMC must ensure that every new road includes a proper and safe footpath.

What Can Citizens Do If Their Right Is Violated?

The Supreme Court gave citizens a powerful legal tool. Any violation of the right to walk on a footpath now allows citizens to seek constitutional remedies. This includes the right to claim compensation. Importantly, citizens can seek this remedy independently of the Motor Vehicles Act. They do not need to go through that law alone.

This is a significant development. It means a pedestrian who is injured due to the absence or poor condition of a footpath can approach the court directly under constitutional provisions.

What Was the Case That Led to This Ruling?

The case arose from a heartbreaking incident. Maniyar Iliyaz, also known as Shaik Riyaz, filed a civil appeal after his five-year-old son was killed in a road accident. The child was walking to a nearby school with his father around 9 AM. A tanker lorry struck the child from behind. The boy later succumbed to his injuries.

The Supreme Court restored and enhanced the compensation amount payable to the bereaved father to Rs 11,44,628. The court overturned the High Court’s earlier reduction of this award. It directed the compensation to be paid within two months.

What Did the Court Say About Urban Planning?

The bench made pointed observations about how urban planning has failed pedestrians for decades. The court noted that policies under the Motor Vehicles Act have often favoured motorised transport at the expense of pedestrians. This has resulted in inadequate and unsafe footpaths across the country.

The bench remarked that wheels have eclipsed our imagination when it came to urban planning priorities. The court also described walking as the simplest of all human activities. It noted that walking has long been an integral part of Indian culture, daily life, and even the country’s freedom movement.

What Action Has the Supreme Court Directed?

The court directed its registry to forward copies of this judgment to three central ministries. These are the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, the Ministry of Rural Development, and the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. The Law Commission of India has also been directed to receive a copy for consideration of legal and policy measures.

The court also recommended the creation of a dedicated regulatory mechanism to safeguard the right to walk. In a notable procedural step, the apex court converted the matter into a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. It made the Union Government a party to the proceedings.

What Does This Mean for Nagpur?

This ruling has direct implications for Nagpur’s footpaths, many of which are broken, encroached upon, or completely absent on major roads. Citizens who face unsafe or missing footpaths in Nagpur can now use this Supreme Court judgment to file complaints against NMC or even seek constitutional remedies.

The ruling puts pressure on NMC to treat footpath construction as a legal obligation and not merely a convenience. Every road project in Nagpur must now include a properly designed and maintained footpath as a matter of constitutional compliance.

Published: June 19, 2026 | Category: Nagpur Local | By: Nagpur Updates Desk

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has taken stern action in the long-running Poonam Chambers illegal construction case — dismissing the petitioner’s plea, seizing nearly ₹10 lakh in fines, and issuing show-cause notices to NMC officials for negligence. At the same time, the court has granted NMC 2 additional months to complete the demolition of the illegal 7th floor of Poonam Chambers on Chhindwara Road.

Latest Development: June 19, 2026

The Case: 20 Years of Illegal Construction, 2 Years of Court Battles

To understand today’s order, it is essential to trace the history of this case — one that spans over two decades.

2004: NMC issued a notice declaring the 7th floor of Poonam Chambers completely illegal — the construction exceeded the sanctioned height by three metres. Shops were also illegally built in the basement area earmarked for parking.

2005: Former Corporator Vijay Babhre filed a petition before the Nagpur High Court alleging large-scale violations at Poonam Chambers.

2015-2024: Despite the HC petition and clear legal findings, NMC took no action for nearly a decade — a period the court has specifically described as “institutional silence” and “civic apathy.”

November 2024: The Supreme Court issued directions mandating strict action including demolition against illegal constructions across India. NMC was pulled up for not acting.

November 2025: HC directed petitioner Nandkumar Harchandani to present sanctioned building plans and ownership documents.

January 2026: HC directed NMC to take a “reasoned decision” by January 21 — rejecting NMC’s request for more time until February.

February 5, 2026: NMC launched demolition of approximately 70 illegal structures at Poonam Chambers premises, targeting the basement area first.

March 5, 2026: Petitioner stopped the demolition work — forcing NMC to step in and complete it. HC expressed strong displeasure.

March 2026: HC ordered petitioner to reimburse NMC’s demolition costs — NMC to submit cost estimate; petitioner given 2 weeks after receiving assessment.

April 2026: Poonam Tower illegal construction fully demolished. Poonam Chambers 7th floor still pending — NMC sought more time.

June 19, 2026 (today): HC dismisses petition, seizes ₹9.97 lakh fine, grants NMC 2 months for 7th floor demolition, issues show-cause notices to NMC officials.

What the Court Said Today

The division bench of Justice Anil Pansare and Justice Rajnish Vyas passed several significant orders:

Petition dismissed: The petitioner’s plea was rejected outright — the court having already declared the construction illegal and directed its demolition in previous orders.

₹9.97 lakh fine seized: The amount — deposited by the petitioner — has been seized and directed to be deposited in the Public Welfare Account. This is a strong punitive signal that the court treats the petitioner’s conduct throughout this case as deeply problematic.

2-month extension for NMC: The court gave NMC 2 additional months to complete demolition of the 7th floor of Poonam Chambers. This is a measured approach — granting time while maintaining judicial pressure.

Show-cause notices to NMC officials: In a significant accountability measure, the court issued show-cause notices to NMC officials for their negligence in this case. The fact that the 7th floor was declared illegal in 2004 and NMC failed to demolish it for over two decades is a failure the court is now holding specific officials accountable for.

What Has Already Been Demolished

The Poonam Chambers case has seen significant action in 2026 despite the headline issue (7th floor) still pending:

Poonam Tower — 100% demolished. All illegal structures in Poonam Tower have been removed.

Poonam Chambers basement — The approximately 70 illegal structures in the basement parking area (illegally converted to commercial shops) have been demolished.

7th floor — still pending — This is the original, primary violation. The floor that exceeds the sanctioned height by three metres and was declared illegal in 2004 is still standing. NMC now has 2 months to remove it.

The RBI Angle

An unusual dimension of this case involves the Reserve Bank of India — which was added as a respondent after a demand draft of ₹10 lakh submitted by the petitioner was returned by RBI with the remark “Wrongly Delivered.”

The court registry confirmed the remark was system-generated and the bank could not provide further clarification — leading the court to issue notices to both RBI and IndusInd Bank. The court had earlier accepted RBI’s apology but directed officials to tender apologies before the court registry.

Why This Case Matters for Nagpur

The Poonam Chambers case is not just about one illegal building. It is a landmark test of whether Nagpur’s civic and legal systems can actually enforce building regulations against established commercial properties.

The 20-year gap between the NMC’s own 2004 illegal-construction notice and the eventual demolition action in 2026 is a damning indictment of how enforcement works — or fails to work — for well-connected commercial properties in Indian cities.

This case shares DNA with the recent Ashish NX fire — where a commercial store illegally merged three residential buildings without permission, creating a deadly fire hazard. In both cases, the violations were known for years; action came only under extraordinary pressure.

Q: What is Poonam Chambers? Poonam Chambers is a multi-storey commercial building on Chhindwara Road, Nagpur. Its 7th floor was declared illegal by NMC in 2004 for exceeding the sanctioned building height by 3 metres. The basement was also illegally converted from parking space to commercial shops.

Q: Who is Nandkumar Harchandani? He is the petitioner in this case — associated with Kumar Hotels Private Limited — who has been fighting in court over this property. The court has repeatedly expressed displeasure over his failure to honour demolition commitments.

Q: Was the fine ₹10 lakh or ₹9.97 lakh? The amount seized was ₹9.97 lakh — which has been directed to the Public Welfare Account.

Q: When will the 7th floor finally be demolished? NMC has been given 2 more months from June 19, 2026 — meaning the deadline is approximately August 19, 2026.

Q: What happens to NMC officials who got show-cause notices? They must respond to the notices explaining why they failed to act on the illegal construction for over two decades. Depending on the response, disciplinary action may follow.

Accountability in Action — Slowly

The Poonam Chambers case is a slow-moving but ultimately meaningful example of judicial accountability forcing civic action in Nagpur. It took 20 years, a Supreme Court directive, multiple HC orders, a reluctant demolition, a stopped demolition, a ₹10 lakh fine, and show-cause notices — but the 7th floor is now finally coming down.

Nagpur Updates will track the NMC’s progress on the Poonam Chambers 7th floor demolition over the next two months and report the moment this 20-year-old illegal structure is finally removed.

Nagpur Airport runway recarpeting: The long-awaited runway recarpeting project at Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport in Nagpur is finally nearing its end. MIHAN (Maharashtra Airport Development Company), which operates the airport in collaboration with the Airports Authority of India (AAI), has confirmed that the work is set to be completed by May 21, 2025. This announcement was made through an affidavit submitted by Abid Ruhi, Senior Airport Director of MIHAN, in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court.

Background of the Runway Recarpeting Project

Why the Recarpeting is Necessary

The runway at Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport has been showing significant signs of wear and tear due to daily operations. The surface has deteriorated to the point where loose gravel and rough patches pose potential risks during aircraft landings and take-offs. The last recarpeting was carried out a decade ago, making this maintenance work crucial to ensure the safety and efficiency of the airport.

Initial Delays and Challenges

The recarpeting work, which was initially planned for an earlier date, faced several delays. These delays were primarily due to bureaucratic hurdles, logistical challenges, and the complex nature of the work required. The project, essential for the smooth functioning of the airport, has been a point of concern for both passengers and airlines.

Current Status and Future Timeline

Confirmation of Completion Date

According to the affidavit submitted by MIHAN, the contractor responsible for the runway recarpeting has been finalized through a tender process by the AAI. A detailed project schedule has been provided, with a clear commitment to completing the work by May 21, 2025. This timeline is now set in stone following the issuance of the work order on May 14, 2024.

Steps Taken to Mitigate Disruption

To minimize the disruption caused by the runway closure, MIHAN has been proactive in coordinating with airlines. All airlines operating from the airport were informed in December 2023 about the upcoming closures, allowing them ample time to reschedule flights and adjust operations accordingly.

Implications for Passengers and Airlines

Impact on Flight Schedules

The ongoing runway work has inevitably led to adjustments in flight schedules. Some flights have been rescheduled or rerouted to ensure passenger safety and avoid operational conflicts. While this has caused some inconvenience, the timely communication by MIHAN has helped in reducing the impact on travelers.

Safety Measures During the Recarpeting Process

Safety remains the top priority during the recarpeting process. The airport has implemented stringent measures to ensure that ongoing operations do not compromise the safety of passengers or aircraft. Temporary closures of the runway are being managed meticulously to align with the project’s progress.

Technical Aspects of the Recarpeting

Materials and Techniques Used

The recarpeting involves the use of high-grade materials designed to withstand heavy aircraft traffic and harsh weather conditions. Advanced techniques are being employed to ensure that the new surface is durable and can support the airport’s operations for the next decade or more.

Environmental Considerations

In addition to safety and durability, the recarpeting project also considers environmental impacts. Efforts are being made to reduce the carbon footprint of the construction work, including the use of sustainable materials and methods.

The Role of MIHAN and AAI in the Project

MIHAN’s Responsibility and Oversight

MIHAN, as the operating body of the airport, holds the primary responsibility for overseeing the recarpeting project. Their role includes managing the project’s progress, coordinating with contractors, and ensuring compliance with safety standards.

Collaboration with AAI

The Airports Authority of India (AAI) has played a crucial role in facilitating the recarpeting project. From finalizing the contractor to ensuring that the project adheres to national and international aviation standards, AAI’s involvement has been instrumental in moving the project forward.

Legal and Public Scrutiny

PIL and High Court’s Involvement

The delay in the recarpeting project led to the filing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. The court’s scrutiny ensured that MIHAN and AAI were held accountable for the delays and that a clear timeline was established.

MIHAN’s Response to Public Concerns

In response to the concerns raised by the public and the court, MIHAN has been transparent about the challenges faced during the project. The affidavit submitted by Abid Ruhi detailed the steps being taken to complete the project and mitigate any further delays.

Future Prospects for Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport

Post-Recarpeting Benefits

Once the recarpeting is complete, the airport is expected to see significant improvements in its operational efficiency. The new runway surface will not only enhance safety but also enable the airport to handle more traffic, thereby boosting its capacity and services.

Long-Term Maintenance Plans

MIHAN has also outlined long-term maintenance plans to ensure that the runway remains in optimal condition. Regular inspections and timely repairs will be part of the ongoing strategy to prevent future degradation.

The completion of the runway recarpeting at Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport marks a significant milestone in ensuring the safety and efficiency of one of Nagpur’s key infrastructure assets. While the delays have caused some inconvenience, the steps taken by MIHAN and AAI demonstrate a strong commitment to delivering a high-quality, durable runway that will serve the region for years to come. As the May 2025 deadline approaches, passengers and airlines can look forward to smoother, safer operations at the airport.

1. Why was the runway recarpeting at Nagpur Airport delayed?
The delays were due to a combination of bureaucratic challenges, logistical issues, and the complexity of the work involved.

2. When will the runway recarpeting be completed?
The recarpeting is scheduled to be completed by May 21, 2025.

3. How will the recarpeting affect flight schedules?
Some flights may be rescheduled or rerouted to minimize disruption during the recarpeting process.

4. What materials are being used for the recarpeting?
High-grade, durable materials that can withstand heavy aircraft traffic and harsh weather conditions are being used.

5. How is passenger safety being ensured during the recarpeting?
Stringent safety measures and temporary runway closures are being managed to align with the progress of the recarpeting project.

Maharashtra school safety measures: In response to a recent tragic event at a school in Badlapur, the Maharashtra government has taken swift and decisive action to enhance the safety and security of students across the state. On Wednesday, the government issued a directive requiring all schools to install CCTV cameras on their premises within a month. This directive is part of a broader set of measures aimed at increasing accountability and ensuring the protection of children in educational institutions.

The Urgency Behind the Directive

A Case That Shocked the State

The incident in Badlapur has left the community in shock and has raised serious concerns about the safety protocols in schools. The directive by the Maharashtra government is a direct response to this tragedy, aiming to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future.

CCTV Cameras: A Necessary Precaution (Maharashtra school safety measures)

The installation of CCTV cameras is a crucial step towards ensuring a secure environment for students. With surveillance in place, not only can potential incidents be deterred, but any misconduct can also be recorded, providing essential evidence if needed.

Key Components of the Directive

Mandatory Background Checks

One of the most significant aspects of the new directive is the requirement for thorough background checks of all school employees. The school managements are now mandated to collaborate with local police stations to ensure that every staff member has a clean record.

Stringent Recruitment Processes

In addition to background checks, the recruitment of non-teaching staff will now involve stricter scrutiny. Schools are required to be vigilant during the hiring process to ensure that only individuals with the highest integrity are employed.

Employee Monitoring

Current employees will also be under closer observation. Schools must maintain up-to-date records, including photographs, of all staff members and share this information with the local police. This measure ensures that there is accountability and that any suspicious behavior can be quickly reported.

Installation of Complaint Boxes

The directive also mandates the installation of complaint boxes on school premises. This allows students, parents, and staff to anonymously report any concerns or incidents, ensuring that issues can be addressed promptly.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Penalties for Schools

Schools that fail to comply with the new safety measures will face severe penalties. The government has warned that non-compliance could lead to the withholding of financial grants or even the revocation of the school’s operating license. This strict enforcement underscores the importance of these safety protocols.

Utilization of Funds for CCTV Networks

To assist schools in implementing these measures, the government has authorized the use of up to five percent of allocated funds from the District Planning and Development Council for the establishment of CCTV networks in state-run and aided schools. This financial support ensures that all schools, regardless of their resources, can meet the new safety requirements.

Monitoring and Reporting

Regular Review of CCTV Footage

The directive requires that CCTV footage be reviewed at least three times a week. School principals are responsible for this task and must report any concerning incidents to the police immediately. This frequent monitoring is crucial for maintaining a safe environment and ensuring that any issues are addressed swiftly.

Educational Initiatives: Good Touch, Bad Touch Program

Empowering Students

In addition to the security measures, the directive includes an educational component aimed at empowering students. Women and Child Welfare Minister Aditi Tatkare announced that the “Good Touch, Bad Touch” program will now be mandatory in all government and private schools across Maharashtra.

Importance of the Program

This program is designed to educate children about personal boundaries and help them recognize inappropriate behavior. In light of the recent incident in Badlapur, the program’s significance has been further emphasized, highlighting the need for children to be aware and informed about their safety.

The Road Ahead

Ensuring Compliance and Effectiveness

As the deadline for the implementation of these measures approaches, it is crucial for school administrations to act swiftly. The government’s stringent enforcement of these directives will likely lead to significant improvements in school safety across the state.

While the immediate focus is on compliance, the long-term impact of these measures could lead to a cultural shift in how schools in Maharashtra approach student safety. By fostering a more vigilant and protective environment, these directives could prevent future tragedies and ensure that schools remain safe havens for learning.

The Maharashtra government’s directive following the Badlapur incident marks a critical step towards enhancing the safety and security of students across the state. With the mandatory installation of CCTV cameras, stringent background checks, and educational programs, the government is taking a comprehensive approach to protect children. As schools work to meet the one-month deadline, the focus must remain on creating a secure and supportive environment for all students.